I was introduced to R. Scott Clark's rebuke of Piper for his views on Wright and Wilson by Michael F. Bird. Even though I did not read it thoroughly, but in my mind, a few objections have already formed.
- callous associations of Wright to that of 'another gospel' without even quoting his writings to show as evidence for such conclusions
- frequent quotes of traditions in interpreting the bible as if these traditions supersede the careful exegesis of the bible itself
- an almost exclusive view in treating Reformed traditions as highly orthodox or the bearers of the true gospel and Christian faith
It saddens me when one group of brethren decide to paint themselves as the only 'right' camp at the expense of another without giving a careful thought of what the other party has done or is trying to say.
Comments